Agreed. In a personal project I'm hoping to release I've taken the approach of integrating at the Git layer, but then providing some small quality of life improvements if you're using Git{Hub,Lab} in a way that I can easily support more in the future. GitHub is not Git.
> it also makes it easier for us to integrate with other Git providers such as GitLab, BitBucket or Phabricator.
I worry sometimes that we've made GitHub too loadbearing so its great to see a devtools company embrace git more generally that just GitHub
Agreed. In a personal project I'm hoping to release I've taken the approach of integrating at the Git layer, but then providing some small quality of life improvements if you're using Git{Hub,Lab} in a way that I can easily support more in the future. GitHub is not Git.
Thanks! (author here)
Huh, I didn't see the .lisp coming in the linked source code.
But since T1892 is presumably their internal ticket tracker, I wonder why this got the call-out
> (not (str:containsp "ssh.dev.azure.com" repo))
; https://github.com/screenshotbot/screenshotbot-oss/blob/main...